"One of the Biggest Political Deceptions in Jamaica’s History?"

“One of the Biggest Political Deceptions in Jamaica’s History?”

Good evening, Jamaicans and the world.

There comes a moment in every nation's history when its people must decide whether they are governed by documents and truth, or by gestures and theater.

Tonight, I want to speak about what may go down as one of the most serious alleged deceptions ever presented to the Jamaican people—not because of what was proven, but because of what was not.

This goes beyond politics.

It concerns national standards and evidence.

This is about evidence.

And this is about respect for the Jamaican people 🇯🇲

Recently, during the Prime Minister’s debate in August 2025, Mark ‘Gummy Bear’ Golding appeared before the Jamaican public, driving a live broadcast and holding up a sheet of paper, presenting it as supposed proof that he was born in Jamaica. However, the audience could not confirm this because no actual birth information was visible or legible.

Let us pause right there.

What the audience was shown was:

• a white sheet of paper

• blurred

• out of focus

• unreadable

• held up briefly

• with scribbled text no one could decipher

No one could see:

• a birth certificate number

• a registrar’s seal

• a parish name

• a date of birth

• a registrar’s signature

In plain terms, the Jamaican people were not allowed to read the document.

Yet the public was asked to accept it as proof.

THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN EVIDENCE AND PERFORMANCE

In any serious society—whether Jamaica, Canada, Bahamas, Trinidad and Tobago, Barbados, the United States, or the United Kingdom—evidence must be verifiable.

Evidence is not:

• waving paper

• flashing documents on camera

• asking people to “trust me.”

Evidence is:

• legible

• reviewable

• independently verifiable

If a document cannot be read by the public, it cannot be verified by the public.

If it cannot be verified, it is not evidence but performance.

Transparency is not simply showing a document.

Transparency means letting the people examine it.

THE CONTRADICTION THAT CANNOT BE IGNORED

Now here is where this becomes serious.

While the Jamaican public is shown an unreadable paper, a separate, legible official U.S. immigration document—known as the I-94 record—exists and was submitted to the American government. This record explicitly lists the place of birth as London, England.

That document lists the place of birth: London, England.

This is not a rumor.

This is not social media speculation.

This I-94 is a formal record used for official identification by U.S. authorities, indicating a legal, not political, use. Its details can be independently checked and verified.

So Jamaicans must ask a simple, rational question:

Why is the public being asked to accept an unreadable paper, while a readable, official record exists elsewhere stating something different?

That question is not hostile.

That question is reasonable.

WHY THIS MATTERS TO JAMAICA

This is not about individuals.

This is a constitutional and moral issue.

Jamaica is a sovereign nation. Citizenship matters.

Birthright matters.

Eligibility for leadership matters.

If the standard becomes:

• “Just trust what I hold up.”

• “Don’t ask to read it.”

• “Don’t verify it.”

Then we are no longer a country/island governed by law—we are a society governed by optics and persuasion.

And that is dangerous.

Because if this standard is accepted here, it will be accepted everywhere where blacks are the majority.

WHY MANY SEE THIS AS A MAJOR DECEPTION

This is why many Jamaicans now describe this moment as one of the biggest alleged scams in Jamaica’s political history—not because of name-calling, but because of method. The PNPLGBTQ+ Criminal Organization Supporters, voters, and activists buy into this scam one hundred percent because they are NOT Jamaicans, they are comrades, which is why these people are in a cult and will destroy and betray their country. Sad indeed!

A method where:

• proof is implied, not produced

• documents are flashed, not examined

• Trust is demanded, not earned.

If a leader truly had indisputable proof, the solution would be simple:

• Release a clear, certified birth certificate.

• allow independent verification

• put the matter to rest forever

The refusal—or failure—to do that keeps the controversy alive.

The supporters, voters, and activists of the PNPL:GBTQ+ Criminal Organization are like organic robots incapable of independent thought. These are not Jamaicans but comrades whom you can give poison to drink and tell them that someone else will die, and they drink the poison given to them with a smile, not knowing that they are the ones who are going to die! “The greatest weapon in the hands of the oppressed is the mind of the oppressed,” said Steve Biko.”Marcus Garvey stated, "Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery; none but ourselves can free our minds.”

Jamaicans are not ignorant. Comrades are!

We are not children. Comrades are dunces!

And we are not obligated to suspend logic for anyone. Comrades lack critical thinking skills!

This is not about hate or party colors.

This is not about party colors.

This is about truth versus theater.

History will not ask who shouted the loudest.

History will ask who produced the documents.

Until clear, legible, verifiable proof is placed before the Jamaican people, it is reasonable, lawful, and responsible to question what we are being shown—and why.

Jamaica deserves records, not rituals.

Proof, not performance.

Truth, not theater.

Transparency or Theater? Jamaicans Deserve Proof 🇯🇲

Jamaicans, this must be said clearly and responsibly.

In a recent video, Mark Golding held up a sheet of white paper and implied that it was proof that he is a born Jamaican. However, what the public was shown was neither readable, verifiable, nor examinable by the Jamaican people.

No one could see:

• a birth certificate number

• a registrar’s seal

• a parish of birth

• a date

• or any issuing authority

In plain terms, the audience could not read the document. Holding up an unreadable paper is not disclosure. It is the appearance of disclosure.

At the same time, an official U.S. immigration document (Form I-94)—submitted to the American government for legal identification—lists the place of birth as London, England. That document is legible, formal, and created for legal purposes, not political optics.

When the public is asked to accept an unreadable document shown briefly on camera, while a clear, contradictory record exists elsewhere, Jamaicans have every right to question what they are being told.

This is not about hatred or party politics.

This is about standards.

Transparency means:

• releasing clear documents

• allowing independent verification

• letting the people read for themselves

Until that happens, Jamaicans are being asked to trust presentation over proof—and that is not how a serious nation operates.

Jamaica deserves records, not rituals.

Proof, not performance.

🇯🇲 Let’s be clear and fair:

• The paper shown in the video is unreadable

• No Jamaican birth record was visible or verifiable

• An official U.S. I-94 lists place of birth: London, England

• Holding up a blurred document ≠ proof

This is not transparency — it is theater.

Jamaicans deserve clear, verifiable records, not gestures.

🇯🇲 Truth over performance. Always.