UCC! UNIVERSITY OF CORRUPTION & CRIMINALITY?
- JAMAICAN YOUNG POLICE
- 20 hours ago
- 10 min read





Jamaica, tonight I want to introduce you to a university that does not exist on paper.
You cannot apply to it.
You cannot find its campus.
You cannot receive an accredited degree from it.
And before anybody deliberately misunderstands me, UCC — the “University of Corruption and Criminality” — is my political satire and metaphor. It is not a real institution, and calling someone a “graduate” is not proof that the person committed a crime.
But the metaphor raises a serious question:
Can a political culture become a university? Yes!
Can generation after generation inherit attitudes about political loyalty, patronage, tribalism, accountability and power until those attitudes become almost institutional knowledge?
Because tonight we're going back to Michael Manley.
Not simply to praise him.
Not simply to condemn him.
We're going to investigate his political legacy and ask a much harder question:
What did the PNP become after Michael Manley?
And I'm going to use one image throughout this discussion.
TERMITES.
When termites enter a building, they don't necessarily knock down the front door.
They work quietly.
The paint can still look beautiful.
The roof can still shine.
The building can look magnificent from the road.
But behind the walls, something may be eating the structure.
That is how corruption can operate inside institutions.
One favor.
One contract.
One political connection.
One person protected because he is “our man.”
One questionable act excused because “our side” did it.
One standard for orange.
Another standard for green.
And eventually, ladies and gentlemen, the greatest casualty isn't merely money.
It is the conscience of a country.
So tonight we're opening the doors of my imaginary university.
Welcome to UCC.
And stay with me until the end because I am going to give you tonight's CODE WORD—and when you hear it, I want you to put it in the comments so I know you read through the entire investigation.
BEFORE WE PUT MICHAEL MANLEY ON TRIAL, UNDERSTAND THE HISTORY
Let us establish something immediately.
Michael Manley did not literally establish an institution called the “University of Corruption and Criminality.”
That is my metaphor.
Michael Manley was one of the most consequential political leaders in Jamaican history. He became PNP president in 1969, and prime minister in 1972, and his political legacy includes major social reforms and an ideological transformation of Jamaican politics.
So if we're going to criticize his legacy, we should be intellectually strong enough to acknowledge its accomplishments too.
That matters.
Because propaganda begins when you tell your audience only the facts that help your argument.
Investigation begins when you tell them the uncomfortable facts on both sides.
Manley's supporters remember social reform, greater attention to workers, education, equality, national identit,y and an effort to give ordinary Jamaicans a greater sense that government belonged to them too.
Those things cannot simply be erased because we disagree with other aspects of his politics.
But leadership must also be evaluated by something larger than intention:
What political culture developed around it?
What happened to Jamaica's political institutions?
What happened to political tribalism?
What happened when communities increasingly became identified by political allegiance?
And what lessons were passed to subsequent generations?
That is where my UCC metaphor begins.
THE FIRST COURSE: POLITICAL TRIBALISM 101
Imagine walking into our fictional university.
First classroom:
POLITICAL TRIBALISM 101
The lecturer writes two words on the board:
US versus THEM.
That may be one of the most destructive ideas ever introduced into democratic politics.
Because democracy requires disagreement.
Tribalism requires enemies.
Democracy says:
“I disagree with you.”
Tribalism says:
“You are against us.”
And once politics becomes tribal, principles begin disappearing.
If the other party does something questionable:
CORRUPTION!
If our party does something similar:
LET'S WAIT FOR THE FACTS.
If the opponent's politician is accused:
RESIGN IMMEDIATELY!
If our politician is accused:
THIS IS A POLITICAL ATTACK!
Ladies and gentlemen, that mentality doesn't belong exclusively to the PNP.
The JLP can suffer from precisely the same disease.
That distinction is important.
Because if I condemn blind, unquestioning PNP loyalty while practicing blind JLP loyalty, then I have simply changed the color of the uniform.
I haven't changed the mentality.
And that brings us to the first examination question at UCC:
Can you condemn wrongdoing when the person accused belongs to your own political tribe?
That is the examination Jamaica keeps failing.
CORRUPTION IS A TERMITE
Now remember my termite.
A termite doesn't need to destroy the entire building tonight.
It only needs permission to keep eating.
That's corruption.
Corruption doesn't necessarily begin with somebody carrying away millions of dollars.
Sometimes it begins with an attitude:
“Everybody does it.”
Listen carefully whenever you hear that sentence.
“Everybody does it.”
That is how standards die.
Because if everybody does it, nobody is responsible.
And if nobody is responsible, nobody needs to change.
Imagine discovering termites in your house, and your contractor tells you:
“Don't worry about those termites. Your neighbor has termites too.”
Would that make you comfortable?
Of course not!
You would say:
GET THE TERMITES OUT OF MY HOUSE!
So when somebody raises concerns about the PNP, saying “but the JLP does it too” isn't an answer.
And when somebody raises concerns about the JLP, saying “but the PNP did worse” isn't an answer either.
Both buildings need treatment.
Wrong does not become right because your opponent is also wrong.
THE SECOND COURSE: SELECTIVE OUTRAGE 201
Welcome to your second class.
SELECTIVE OUTRAGE 201.
This is where political hypocrisy becomes sophisticated.
Yesterday:
“This conduct is disgraceful!”
Today:
“Well, you have to understand the circumstances.”
What changed?
Not the principle.
The political jersey changed.
This is where corruption of the mind can become more dangerous than corruption involving money.
Because financial corruption can sometimes be audited.
Money leaves trails.
Contracts leave paperwork.
Bank transfers create records.
But how do you audit a conscience?
How do you investigate a mind that has trained itself to excuse wrongdoing whenever the correct political color is attached?
That person can become the perfect defender of a broken system without receiving one dollar.
Nobody needs to bribe him.
His tribalism does the work for free.
Think about that.
The most effective political surrogate may be the one who doesn't even realize he's behaving like one.
MICHAEL MANLEY AND THE QUESTION OF LEGACY
Now we return to Michael Manley.
And here I want precision.
A leader can have tremendous accomplishments and still leave behind political consequences worthy of serious criticism.
Those ideas aren't contradictory.
Manley remains enormously important to Jamaican history.
But historical importance doesn't create immunity from examination.
The question isn't:
Was Michael Manley good or evil?
History isn't a children's cartoon.
The better question is:
What political institutions, expectations and practices developed during and after his leadership, and what survived him?
Because leaders don't merely pass laws.
They shape political culture.
They establish expectations.
They teach supporters what politics means.
And subsequent leaders inherit those institutions.
Sometimes they improve them.
Sometimes they exploit them.
Sometimes they make them worse.
So when I call Michael Manley the “founder” of my imaginary UCC, understand precisely what I'm doing:
I am using satire to interrogate the political culture associated with an era and its descendants—not claiming Michael Manley founded a criminal organization or personally committed crimes for which there is no evidence.
That distinction makes the argument stronger, not weaker.
THE THIRD COURSE: PATRONAGE 301
Welcome to the third classroom.
PATRONAGE 301.
Here is where democracy encounters one of its greatest temptations.
Government possesses resources.
Jobs.
Contracts.
Housing.
Infrastructure.
Appointments.
Access.
Political influence.
Now ask yourself:
What happens when citizens begin believing access to those things depends upon political loyalty?
The citizen gradually stops seeing government as our government.
Instead:
“That is PNP government.”
Or:
“That is JLP government.”
That mentality is poison.
A government elected by Jamaicans must govern Jamaicans.
Not comrades.
Not labourites.
Citizens.
Your political affiliation should never determine whether your road gets fixed.
Your political affiliation should never determine whether government treats you with dignity.
Your political affiliation should never determine whether wrongdoing against you matters.
Because once government resources become perceived as political rewards, citizenship itself becomes corrupted.
THE DEGREE PROGRAM: BLIND LOYALTY
Now you're ready for the undergraduate program.
Your major?
BLIND LOYALTY.
And here is your assignment:
Defend everything your party does.
No independent thinking allowed.
If your leader says left, go left.
If tomorrow he says right, explain why right was always correct.
If someone produces evidence contradicting yesterday's argument, don't examine the evidence.
Attack the person presenting it.
Sound familiar?
This is not uniquely Jamaican.
Political movements around the world develop these tendencies.
But Jamaica has particular historical reasons to take political tribalism seriously.
Our politics has sometimes carried consequences far beyond arguments in Parliament.
Communities have suffered.
Families have suffered.
Ordinary Jamaicans have paid the price.
Therefore, political independence isn't merely intellectual.
It can be patriotic.
THE REAL UNIVERSITY IS THE HUMAN MIND
This is where this discussion becomes deeper.
Forget PNP headquarters.
Forget Gordon House.
Forget political meetings.
The most important campus in my UCC metaphor is located right here:
Inside the human mind.
Because corruption doesn't only mean stealing public money.
There is also intellectual corruption.
Moral corruption.
Institutional corruption.
When someone knows something is wrong but convinces himself it is acceptable because his party benefits, something has been corrupted.
When truth becomes negotiable, something has been corrupted.
When principles change depending upon who is accused, something has been corrupted.
And when citizens surrender independent thought to political organizations, democracy itself becomes weaker.
That is the termite reaching the foundation.
“BUT WHAT ABOUT THE JLP?”
Somebody is typing it already:
“JYP, WHAT ABOUT THE JLP?”
Excellent question.
Investigate them.
Audit them.
Expose corruption wherever credible evidence establishes it.
Prosecute criminals regardless of political affiliation.
PNP?
Investigate.
JLP?
Investigate.
Independent?
Investigate.
Businessman?
Investigate.
Police officer?
Investigate.
Minister?
Investigate.
Prime minister?
Investigate.
Nobody should be above the law.
That is the Jamaica I want.
Because my loyalty isn't supposed to belong to a political party when the issue is justice.
My loyalty should belong to principle.
And if tomorrow credible evidence proves wrongdoing by someone I previously defended, my position must change with the evidence.
Otherwise I am not investigating.
I'm campaigning.
CRIMINALITY REQUIRES EVIDENCE
Now I need to emphasize something because we're using the provocative phrase:
“UNIVERSITY OF CORRUPTION & CRIMINALITY.”
Criminality isn't established because somebody appears on my thumbnail.
Criminality isn't established because somebody belongs to the PNP.
Criminality isn't established because somebody's photograph appears beside another person's photograph.
A criminal allegation requires evidence.
A criminal conviction requires the legal process.
Association is not guilt.
That principle matters enormously.
And viewers should remember it throughout this series.
When I discuss an allegation, I will call it an allegation.
When somebody makes a claim, I will identify who made the claim.
When a court establishes something, I will tell you what the court established.
When something remains speculation, I will tell you it remains speculation.
That is how we separate investigation from character assassination.
THE FOURTH COURSE: ACCOUNTABILITY AVOIDANCE 401
You're almost ready to graduate.
Your final course:
ACCOUNTABILITY AVOIDANCE 401.
The assignment is simple.
Whenever somebody asks a difficult question, answer a different question.
“Where did this money go?”
Response:
“But what about what happened twenty years ago?”
No.
Answer the question.
“Who authorized this?”
Response:
“The opposition is playing politics.”
Maybe they are.
But who authorized it?
“Was the proper procedure followed?”
Response:
“Our party has always supported transparency.”
Wonderful.
Was the procedure followed?
You see what accountability requires?
Answers.
Not slogans.
Not colors.
Not political history lessons.
Answers.
And Jamaica should demand that standard from every administration.
THE TERMITES REACH THE FOUNDATION
Remember the house from the beginning?
We started with one termite.
Now imagine twenty years pass.
Nobody treated the infestation.
Different families lived inside.
Every new owner painted the walls.
One painted them orange.
Another painted them green.
Orange again.
Green again.
Beautiful house.
Fresh paint.
Election posters everywhere.
But nobody repaired the timber.
Then one morning—
CRACK.
Part of the structure collapses.
Everybody acts surprised.
“How could this happen?”
It happened because we confused paint with structure.
That is my warning about Jamaica.
Changing governments matters.
Elections matter.
But changing political colors without strengthening institutions cannot cure corruption.
Orange paint doesn't kill termites.
Green paint doesn't kill termites.
Strong institutions do.
Transparency does.
Auditing does.
Independent investigations do.
Free journalism does.
Courts do.
Ethical leadership does.
And citizens who refuse to worship politicians do.
WHAT SHOULD THE NEW UNIVERSITY TEACH?
Maybe Jamaica needs another university.
Not UCC.
Call this one:
UNIVERSITY OF ACCOUNTABILITY.
Course number one:
Evidence 101.
Believe what can be demonstrated.
Course number two:
Independent Thinking 201.
Your political party doesn't own your brain.
Course number three:
Equal Standards 301.
If it is wrong when PNP does it, it is wrong when JLP does it.
Course number four:
Rule of Law 401.
Nobody is untouchable.
And your doctoral dissertation?
COUNTRY BEFORE PARTY.
Now that is a university from which every Jamaican should graduate from.
MESSAGE TO PNPLGBTQ+ CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION SUPPORTERS
And let me speak directly to PNP supporters watching me.
Criticism of your party doesn't require hatred of you.
You are Jamaicans.
Many of you genuinely believe the PNP offers Jamaica the best future for Jamaica.
You have every democratic right to believe that.
But if you truly love your party, shouldn't you demand more from it rather than less?
Accountability isn't an attack.
Standards aren't persecution.
Questions aren't hatred.
Sometimes the strongest supporter in the room is the person courageous enough to say:
“My party is wrong.”
Because blind loyalty doesn't strengthen institutions.
It protects weaknesses until those weaknesses become disasters.
MESSAGE TO JLP SUPPORTERS
And Labourites, don't celebrate too quickly.
Because the same examination is coming for you.
If you're enjoying this discussion only because the letters on the screen say PNP, then you've missed my argument.
If tomorrow I expose credible evidence concerning somebody associated with the JLP and suddenly you become offended—
Congratulations.
You've enrolled in another branch of the same university.
Political hypocrisy doesn't change because the shirt changes.
THE FINAL EXAMINATION
So here's your final examination.
No books.
No Google.
No political talking points.
Just your conscience.
Question one:
Can you criticize your own political party?
Question two:
Can you defend someone from the opposing party when the evidence shows they are right?
Question three:
Can you change your mind when new evidence emerges?
Question four:
Can you distinguish allegation from proof?
Question five:
Do you love Jamaica more than you love a political organization?
If you answered yes to all five—
Congratulations.
You don't need a degree from my imaginary UCC.
You have something considerably more valuable:
an independent mind.
CLOSING — BRINGING THE STORY HOME
Ladies and gentlemen, Michael Manley's legacy belongs to Jamaican history.
People can admire parts of that legacy.
People can condemn parts of it.
And reasonable Jamaicans can disagree passionately about what his political era ultimately meant for the country.
But tonight's larger argument goes beyond Michael Manley.
It goes beyond the PNP.
It goes beyond the JLP.
What political culture are we passing to the next generation?
Are we teaching our children that party comes before country?
Are we teaching them that corruption matters only when the opposition commits it?
Are we teaching them that politicians deserve worship?
Or are we teaching them something revolutionary:
Politicians work for us.
Michael Manley is gone.
Other leaders will eventually be gone.
Today's government will one day become yesterday's government.
Today's opposition may become tomorrow's government.
But Jamaica remains.
That's why we must kill the termites instead of merely repainting the house.
Don't defend corruption because you recognize the politician.
Don't condemn somebody because you dislike his political color.
Follow the evidence.
Demand accountability.
Protect the institutions.
And above everything else:
COUNTRY BEFORE PARTY.
If you've stayed with me all the way to the end, here is tonight's code word:
🐜 CODE WORD: TERMITES
Put TERMITES in the comments.
Don't explain it.
Don't give away what it means.
When I see TERMITES, I'll know you stayed until the very end—and you'll know exactly why that word matters.
Because corruption can begin quietly.
It can operate invisibly.
And by the time everybody notices the damage—
the foundation may already be disappearing.


Comments